<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"  standalone="yes" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/"><channel><title>Sutherland</title> <link>http://www.lnglawblog.com</link><description>Sutherland RSS Feed</description> <language>en-US</language> <copyright>Copyright Sutherland</copyright> <webMaster>webmaster@sablaw.com</webMaster> <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:10:28 GMT</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:10:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title><![CDATA[Senate Energy Committee Hears Testimony on LNG Exports]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=b80d26fe-4c3b-449f-ba0e-3b164acfe9fe&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=b80d26fe-4c3b-449f-ba0e-3b164acfe9fe&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:10:20 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[The U.S. Senate Energy &amp; Natural Resources Committee heard testimony from a variety of witnesses at a hearing today on estimates of domestic natural gas supply and the potential benefits or unintended consequences caused by expansion of natural gas exports. According to a <A href="http://www.law360.com/energy/articles/443318/lawmakers-receptive-to-industry-push-for-more-lng-exports" target=_blank>Law360</A> article, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) acting Assistant Secretary Christopher Smith told the Committee that pending DOE LNG applications may take 60 days to process. Also at the hearing, Senator Wyden advocated for an <A href="http://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/democratic-news?ID=d6f01f6a-0166-49ea-bbd3-2cd7bd700f15" target=_blank>updated policy</A> governing LNG exports. Materials from the hearing can be accessed <A href="http://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings-and-business-meetings?ID=0380bed7-f9ef-4450-bfa0-a3af60f7a184" target=_blank>here</A>.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Report Concludes LNG Exports to Have Modest Impact on Domestic Gas Prices]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=001d8b52-2bdb-47b6-9a89-31b272b08875&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=001d8b52-2bdb-47b6-9a89-31b272b08875&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:54:07 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[A new <A href="http://bipartisanpolicy.org/sites/default/files/Bipartisan%20Policy%20Center%20-%20New%20Dynamics%20of%20the%20U.S.%20Natural%20Gas%20Market%20-%20May%202013.pdf" target=_blank>report</A> from the <A href="http://bipartisanpolicy.org/library/staff-paper/new-dynamics-us-natural-gas-market" target=_blank>Bipartisan Policy Center</A> finds that the United States has ample natural gas supplies to meet future demand for natural gas without significant price increases and that U.S. LNG exports will have only a modest impact on domestic gas prices. The report also concludes that domestic gas prices will influence LNG export levels far more than LNG exports will influence domestic prices. The report projects that the United States will become a net exporter of natural gas between 2017 and 2021 in all of the modeled scenarios.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tennessee Gas and Mitsubishi Sign Transportation Agreement For Cameron LNG Export Supplies]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=d2f0d2a3-6c00-46c7-b916-12211220f288&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=d2f0d2a3-6c00-46c7-b916-12211220f288&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:47:26 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kinder Morgan <A href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=93621&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1821253&amp;highlight=" target=_blank>announced</A> that its affiliate Tennessee Gas Pipeline (TGP) has signed a 20-year agreement with Mitsubishi Corporation for firm transportation of 600,000 Dth of natural gas per day on TGP's proposed Southwest Louisiana Supply Project for delivery to the proposed <A href="http://www.lnglawblog.com/05172013cam/" target=_blank>Cameron LNG</A> export terminal in Hackberry, La.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Alternative LNG Export Terminal Proposal Presented to Alaskan Officials]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=a133bed2-407a-41c1-8bf3-1068dae760d3&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=a133bed2-407a-41c1-8bf3-1068dae760d3&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:44:46 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[The <A href="http://www.alaskajournal.com/Alaska-Journal-of-Commerce/May-Issue-3-2013/Japanese-group-offers-fast-track-on-LNG/" target=_blank>Alaska Journal of Commerce</A> reports that Japanese-owned Resources Energy Inc. (REI) has presented a study to Alaskan officials on the feasibility of constructing an LNG export terminal at either Valdez or Nikiski, along with an interconnected pipeline to North Slope gas supplies. According to the article, REI's proposal is less costly and could be developed more quickly than the proposal by major North Slope producers and TransCanada.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Canadian Government Continues Opposition to Downeast LNG Import Terminal]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=7fc2795f-90fa-4a99-bacb-10372837ded1&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=7fc2795f-90fa-4a99-bacb-10372837ded1&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:42:17 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Canadian Ambassador Gary Doer filed a letter at FERC on Friday reiterating the Canadian government's opposition to the proposed Downeast LNG import terminal on the Maine side of Passamaquoddy Bay. Doer stated that the Canadian government's position is that since LNG tankers serving the terminal would have to pass through Canadian waters, the proposal cannot proceed and the Canadian government will not cooperate on coordination planning with U.S. authorities or curtail use of the waterways to accommodate LNG tankers. Copies of the letter can be accessed <A href="http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=13261138" target=_blank>here</A>, and the complete docket for the Downeast project can be found on <A href="http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp" target=_blank>eLibrary</A> by searching for Docket No. CP07-52.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[DOE Conditionally Approves Freeport LNG Exports to Non-FTA Nations]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=df7584e4-8a52-44d3-90dc-2d073b81eafd&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=df7584e4-8a52-44d3-90dc-2d073b81eafd&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:19:40 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued an <A href="http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/05/f0/ord3282.pdf" target=_blank>order</A> conditionally granting <A href="http://www.lnglawblog.com/02112013bp/" target=_blank>Freeport LNG Expansion L.P.</A> and FLNG Liquefaction, LLC's application to export up to 1.4 Bcf/day of domestically produced LNG from the Freeport LNG Terminal on Quintana Island, Texas to nations without a Free Trade Agreement with the United States. DOE's authorization is conditioned on the satisfactory completion of the environmental review process at FERC. Read more in the <A href="http://energy.gov/articles/energy-department-authorizes-second-proposed-facility-export-liquefied-natural-gas" target=_blank>press release</A>.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tolling Agreements Signed for Cameron LNG Capacity]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=4f524536-7b5f-4136-80e3-2ae9c2da9a93&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=4f524536-7b5f-4136-80e3-2ae9c2da9a93&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:16:41 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Yesterday, GDF SUEZ S.A., Mitsubishi Corporation, and Mitsui &amp; Co., Ltd. <A href="http://sempra.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=19080&amp;item=136824" target=_blank>announced</A> that they have signed 20-year tolling capacity and joint-venture agreements for development, financing and construction of LNG export facilities at the existing <A href="http://www.lnglawblog.com/04052013cam/" target=_blank>Cameron LNG</A> import terminal in Hackberry, La. The tolling agreements subscribe the full nameplate capacity of the three-train, 13.5 million-tonnes-per-annum (Mtpa) facility that will provide an export capability of 12 Mtpa of LNG, or approximately 1.7 billion cubic feet per day (Bcfd), and the full regasification capacity of 1.5 Bcfd. Each tolling agreement is for 4 Mtpa. The joint-venture agreement calls for affiliates of GDF SUEZ, Mitsubishi (through a related company jointly established with Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha) and Mitsui each to acquire 16.6-percent equity in the existing facilities and the liquefaction project. A Sempra Energy affiliate will retain 50.2 percent.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Golden Pass Products Requests Initiation of FERC Pre-Filing Process for LNG Export Terminal]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=1727bee6-f968-4cfa-a49c-2ab6f1f591ab&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=1727bee6-f968-4cfa-a49c-2ab6f1f591ab&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:13:43 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<A href="http://www.lnglawblog.com/05092013gp/" target=_blank>Golden Pass Products LLC</A> (Golden Pass) and Golden Pass Pipeline LLC have&nbsp; requested that FERC initiate the pre-filing environmental review process for construction of LNG export facilities at Golden Pass's existing LNG import terminal at Port Arthur, Texas. Golden Pass intends to construct three liquefaction trains and related facilities capable of producing a total of 15.6 metric tons of LNG per year and modifications to the existing interconnected pipeline. Copies of the request can be accessed <A href="http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=13260491" target=_blank>here</A>, and the complete docket for the Golden Pass project can be found on <A href="http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp" target=_blank>eLibrary</A> by searching for Docket No. PF13-14.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Moniz Confirmed as DOE Secretary]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=d664e6f1-b2ce-4a03-987c-29c089ccf93a&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=d664e6f1-b2ce-4a03-987c-29c089ccf93a&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:10:34 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<A href="http://www.law360.com/energy/articles/442255?nl_pk=9a577d34-3517-4859-b8ed-81db55262b6f&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=energy" target=_blank>Law360</A> reports that the U.S. Senate yesterday confirmed Ernest Moniz as the new Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).&nbsp;The article states that Moniz supports the deliberative approach to LNG exports taken by former DOE Secretary Chu.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Report Concludes U.S. LNG Exports Will Increase Jobs with Minimal Price Impacts]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=9c5f130b-915d-49eb-8053-41f168016383&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=9c5f130b-915d-49eb-8053-41f168016383&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:06:56 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[A new <A href="http://www.api.org/news-and-media/news/newsitems/2013/may-2013/~/media/Files/Policy/LNG-Exports/API-LNG-Export-Report-by-ICF.pdf" target=_blank>report</A> from ICF International, prepared for the American Petroleum Institute, estimates that increased exports of U.S. LNG will create between 73,100 to 452,300 new domestic jobs between 2016 and 2035. The report projects domestic natural gas price increases of $0.32 to $1.02 per MMBtu and U.S. GDP growth between $15.6 to $73.6 billion annually during the same time period due to the increased LNG exports. Read more in the <A href="http://www.api.org/news-and-media/news/newsitems/2013/may-2013/report-us-lng-exports-can-boost-economy-but-face-competition" target=_blank>press release</A>.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mexico Pays Near Asian Prices for Spot LNG Cargoes]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=b80453a1-4be3-469b-92e4-6faf8a0f60b2&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=b80453a1-4be3-469b-92e4-6faf8a0f60b2&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:10:31 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[According to articles in <A href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-14/mexico-s-cfe-buys-18-lng-cargoes-from-trafigura-through-2014.html" target=_blank>Bloomberg</A> and <A href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/09/energy-lng-mexico-idUSL6N0DP24F20130509" target=_blank>Reuters</A>, due to increased gas demand that could not be met by U.S. gas pipeline supplies, Mexico's state-owned electric utility Comision Federal de Electricidad recently entered into contracts for spot LNG cargoes at prices near those paid by Asian nations for LNG.&nbsp;The utility historically purchases U.S. gas pipeline supplies at Henry Hub-linked gas prices, but additional U.S. supplies could not be obtained because U.S. pipeline imports into Mexico are running at capacity.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sierra Club Files Comments Opposing Automatic Approval of U.S. LNG Exports to European Union Nations]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=8a2189e5-5324-44e3-8396-6927837eb6bc&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=8a2189e5-5324-44e3-8396-6927837eb6bc&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:07:24 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sierra Club recently filed <A href="http://action.sierraclub.org/site/DocServer/TTIP__Federal_Register__May_10.pdf?docID=13041" target=_blank>comments</A> with the Office of the United States Trade Representative on the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership opposing, among other things, inclusion of a provision for "national treatment for trade in gas" that would require automatic approval of U.S. LNG exports to European Union nations. Sierra Club argued that such a provision would increase domestic gas prices and result in increased pollution from expanded hydraulic fracturing. Read more in the <A href="http://content.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2013/05/sierra-club-submits-comments-proposed-us-eu-trade-deal" target=_blank>press release</A>.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Indian Company Eyeing Nova Scotia for Possible LNG Export Terminal Site]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=60ed9fe9-013d-4c29-927d-27d598210d42&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=60ed9fe9-013d-4c29-927d-27d598210d42&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 19:36:18 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<A href="http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/05/09/canada-india-lng-h-energy-idINDEE9480GO20130509" target=_blank>Reuters</A> reports that Indian company H-Energy has signed an option agreement with the government of Nova Scotia to assess the feasibility of constructing an LNG liquefaction facility and export terminal on the Strait of Canso. The report states that the agreement provides H-Energy with exclusive rights to buy the site if feasibility studies prove satisfactory.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Commercial Framework Agreement Signed for Golden Pass LNG Exports]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=ea34ee6b-887c-4e2d-aded-2702f5a61ab2&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=ea34ee6b-887c-4e2d-aded-2702f5a61ab2&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 20:42:06 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Golden Pass Products LLC <A href="http://goldenpassproducts.com/" target=_blank>announced</A> today that affiliates Qatar Petroleum International and ExxonMobil have signed a Commercial Framework Agreement to sell up to the full 15.6 million metric ton annual output of the proposed liquefaction and export terminal project to be located at <A href="http://www.lnglawblog.com/02082013doe/" target=_blank>Golden Pass Products'</A> existing import terminal in Sabine Pass, Texas. The agreement also provides shipping and sales opportunities to existing and new markets, including leveraging the sponsors' long-term arrangements for international imports via the United Kingdom's South Hook facility.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[House Panel Hears Testimony Supporting LNG Exports]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=47d68b72-2086-4593-84f3-a948e46ee72a&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=47d68b72-2086-4593-84f3-a948e46ee72a&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 21:11:17 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[The U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a hearing today on "U.S. Energy Abundance: Exports and the Changing Global Energy Landscape," focusing on LNG exports. Witnesses testified in support of LNG exports, with one witness advocating efforts to address increased greenhouse gas emissions related to increased LNG exports. Testimony from the hearing can be found <A href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearing/us-energy-abundance-exports-and-changing-global-energy-landscape" target=_blank>here</A>.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Japan Continues Push for U.S. LNG Supplies]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=99e8fbf5-a1b8-4b3c-908b-8f0550446510&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=99e8fbf5-a1b8-4b3c-908b-8f0550446510&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:51:59 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<A href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/05/05/business/motegi-seeks-quick-u-s-approval-of-lng-exports/" target=_blank>The Japan Times</A> reports that Japanese Trade Minister Toshimitsu Motegi met with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Acting Energy Secretary Daniel Poneman in Washington last week to request U.S. government approval of LNG exports to Japan. According to the report, Poneman told Motegi that he fully recognizes that access to U.S. LNG supplies is an urgent issue for Japan, which does not have a Free Trade Agreement with the United States providing for automatic approval of LNG exports, and that DOE will examine each LNG export project under federal law. Motegi took Poneman's remarks as "very positive."]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEAA Seeks Comments on Environmental Review for Prince Rupert LNG Project]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=20f68e89-e6e0-46d0-b19b-8c250cc67798&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=20f68e89-e6e0-46d0-b19b-8c250cc67798&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:49:23 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) is seeking comments on whether a federal environmental assessment is required for BG Group affiliate <A href="http://www.lnglawblog.com/11152012bg1/" target=_blank>Prince Rupert LNG Limited’s</A> proposed LNG export project (Project).&nbsp; The Project involves construction of an LNG liquefaction plant and export terminal on Ridley Island at the Port of Prince Rupert in British Columbia. Comments are due by May 27, 2013. Read more in the <A href="http://ceaa-acee.gc.ca/050/document-eng.cfm?document=88863" target=_blank>Public Notice</A>.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dominion Cove Point LNG Certificate Application Raises Protests from Shippers and Environmental Groups]]></title><guid>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=954152cf-eaaf-42f6-811a-8b3f4c6caf69&amp;RSS=true</guid><link>http://www.lnglawblog.com/BlogEntry.aspx?_entry=954152cf-eaaf-42f6-811a-8b3f4c6caf69&amp;RSS=true</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:46:48 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Shell NA LNG LLC (Shell) and BP Energy Company (BP) filed protests against Dominion Cove Point LNG's (Cove Point) FERC application to construct LNG liquefaction and export facilities at its existing LNG import terminal in Lusby, Md. Shell alleges that Cove Point has not demonstrated (1) that the proposed export project will not degrade the services that Shell currently takes from Cove Point, and (2) that existing customers will not subsidize the costs of the export project. BP alleges unduly preferential conduct stating that Cove Point provided its existing customer Statoil Natural Gas LLC with a unique opportunity to turn back its import capacity, while BP was not offered such an opportunity. BP also protested Cove Point's proposed tariff revisions and requested that FERC require Cove Point to resubmit the tariff proposal after FERC has cured BP’s discrimination allegation. Shell's protest can be found <A href="http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=13252658" target=_blank>here</A> and BP's protest can be found <A href="http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=13252715" target=_blank>here</A>. <br /><br />A coalition of environmental groups, including EarthReports, Inc. (dba Patuxent Riverkeeper), Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., Shenandoah Riverkeeper, Sierra Club, and Stewards of the Lower Susquehanna, Inc., also filed comments opposing the export project, alleging that approval will increase industrial activity and pollution in impaired waters, sensitive wetlands, and intact forest in Maryland and Virginia, and will induce upstream gas production and associated pollution in shale gas regions to the north. The groups asked FERC to prepare a comprehensive environmental impact statement for the project. The <A href="http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=13252753" target=_blank>comments</A> can be found here. The complete docket for the Cove Point project can be found on <A href="http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp" target=_blank>eLibrary</A> by searching for Docket No. CP13-113.]]></description><category>Blog Entry</category></item></channel></rss>